Paris, February 17, 2009 – Officials of the Pakistan government
let it be known this week that in the Swat Valley region of the North
West Frontier Province, once a popular Alpine-like tourist region,
near the frontier with Afghanistan, they have made a peace agreement with the Taliban which will establish a religious regime compatible with the puritanical norms of the Taliban (or “Islamic Students’”) movempent.

Since 2007, Taliban militants have waged what now has proven a
successful campaign to impose their religious standards in the area, occupied by some 12 thousand Pakistan troops. The challengers are numbered in newspaper reports as around some three thousand men

The Taliban campaign has not been meant to establish actual military
occupation and control, but to impose their norms of Muslim piety and
worship through what might be called reinforced persuasion.

They have assassinated officials and community leaders opposed to them, and attacked ordinary people who do not display the outward signs of strict religious observance, or whose conduct violates the Talibans’ own strict interpretations of the Koran and what is known as the Sunnah, a compendium of the sayings and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad.



The agreement signed by the Pakistan political authorities
accepts the Talibans’ strict application of Shariah law.

This decision has been received with dismay by American officials who
have demanded that the Pakistan army expel these militants, who
are part of the larger Taliban movement in northwestern Pakistan that
is attempting -- with notable success -- to drive foreign troops out
of neighboring Afghanistan, together with the U.S.-supported Hamid
Karzai government in Kabul.

Needless to say, Washington is alarmed by this deal between the
Pakistani authorities and a dissident group of citizens. It
is called a “perilous precedent,” as indeed it might prove to be, in
terms of the conventional aims of the United States in that
spectacular but politically tormented region.

It certainly raises again a question this writer has asked a number of times in the past without getting a convincing answer, either from U.S. officials or from those of my colleagues who have worked in the region.

Exactly what do we think we are doing in Afghanistan and Pakistan?
Are we there to liberalize their forms of religious observance, or
conduct a war over theology, or take permanent conrol of Afghanistan
(or Pakistan) and establish permanent NATO bases there (as some
Afghans are convinced) -- or are we searching for Osama bin Laden and his principal collaborators, in order to bring them to justice for
the 2001 attacks carried out against the New York Trade Towers and
the Pentagon?

It seems that we are doing all of these things at the same time. But
why?

It is essential that the new Obama administration give us an answer.
Clearly we want Osama bin Laden, but it is equally clear (on the
basis of present experience there, as in Iraq) that adding another 40
thousand soldiers to the 40 thousand already there, plus the NATO
forces present, offers absolutely no assurance of success in
capturing the head of al Qaeda.

Is it that we actually want permanent bases in Afghanistan? If so,
the American public deserves an explanation of why this is so.

Do we want a permanent American client-state there, such as Iran was for us before the 1979 revolution, or as Iraq was at the time of the
Iran-Iraq war, when Saddam Hussein was our man in the Middle East? (An episode yet to be clarified by the historians).

Do we seriously want to crush Taliban religious belief and liberalize
Islam? To send American clergymen, social reformers, and feminist
scholars there for a series of seminars? To run a new Inquisition at
gun-point, American-style?

What we currently are doing in Pakistan and Afghanistan is blowing up
Pakistanis and Afghans The same New York Times story reporting this
Swat Valley agreement noted in passing that early last Monday
(February 17) an American drone fired four missiles into still
another area close to the Afghan border and killed 31 people,
“according to a government official and a resident.”

As those who know the region mostly acknowledge, this war
between the United States and the Taliban has, since the 2001
American invasion of Afghanistan, provoked something resembling a
religious and nationalist uprising among ethnic Pathans. The Pathans
are the largest tribal group in this part of Central Asia. They are
held to number some 40 million closely allied tribal people.

The final question I would ask is simply whether this is the way Barack Obama and his team really want to take the American people during the next four years?

© Copyright 2009 by Tribune Media Services International. All Rights
Reserved.